Security

AI Activity Investigations: New Microsoft Playbook

2 min read

Summary

Microsoft has published a new investigator playbook to help security teams reconstruct AI-related activity across Microsoft 365 Copilot and Azure AI services. The guidance brings together telemetry, KQL queries, schema references, and detection logic across Purview, Defender, and Sentinel so investigators can move from isolated signals to a clear incident timeline.

Need help with Security?Talk to an Expert

Introduction

As AI tools become part of daily business workflows, security teams need reliable ways to investigate what happened inside them. Microsoft’s new playbook for Microsoft 365 Copilot and Azure AI services is designed to help incident responders reconstruct AI activity using telemetry already available across Microsoft security tools.

What’s new

Microsoft has released an AI investigation playbook that provides a structured methodology for analyzing AI-related activity. The playbook is built around a scope → context → signal model:

  • Scope: Identify who interacted with the AI system, when the activity occurred, and which service was involved.
  • Context: Determine what resources were accessed, what data may have been exposed, and whether the behavior matched expected usage.
  • Signal: Evaluate alerts and detections such as prompt injection attempts, anomalous usage, or credential exposure within the full activity chain.

The playbook also consolidates practical investigation resources into one model, including:

  • Schema references
  • KQL queries
  • Detection patterns and logic
  • Configuration guidance across Microsoft security products

Microsoft says this approach works across Microsoft Purview, Microsoft Defender, and Microsoft Sentinel, helping teams reduce ad hoc pivots between tools.

Why this matters for security teams

AI interactions generate metadata-rich telemetry, including identity, timestamps, and resource access details. That makes it possible to reconstruct events—but only if teams have a repeatable process.

For security operations and incident response teams, this playbook helps answer critical questions:

  • Who used the AI system?
  • What data was accessed during the interaction?
  • Was the activity authorized?
  • Does the behavior indicate normal use, a policy violation, or a possible compromise?

The guidance also extends to agent-based systems, where investigators may need to review which agents are deployed, how they are configured, and what data they are permitted to access.

Next steps

IT and security administrators should review the playbook and validate that the required telemetry and configurations are enabled across their Microsoft security stack. Teams using Microsoft 365 Copilot or Azure AI services should also consider updating investigation procedures to include AI-specific signals and response workflows.

As AI adoption grows, the ability to reconstruct AI activity is becoming a core incident response capability—not a nice-to-have. Microsoft’s playbook is a practical step toward making those investigations more consistent and defensible.

Need help with Security?

Our experts can help you implement and optimize your Microsoft solutions.

Talk to an Expert

Stay updated on Microsoft technologies

AI securityMicrosoft 365 CopilotAzure AIMicrosoft Sentinelincident response

Related Posts

Security

AI Brand Phishing Campaigns Target Microsoft Users

Microsoft Threat Intelligence reports a rise in phishing, malvertising, and SEO-driven attacks that abuse popular AI brands like ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, and DeepSeek as social engineering lures. The campaigns use familiar tactics such as urgent payment notices, fake policy violations, and malicious installers to steal credentials, payment data, and deploy malware, making user awareness and layered defenses critical.

Security

AI GitHub Actions Secret Exposure in Claude Code

Microsoft Threat Intelligence found that Anthropic’s Claude Code GitHub Action could expose CI/CD secrets when AI agents process untrusted GitHub content such as issues, pull requests, and comments. Anthropic fixed the issue in Claude Code 2.1.128, but the research highlights broader risks for any AI-enabled workflow with access to secrets, file reads, or outbound communication.

Security

Agentic AI Failure Modes Taxonomy Updated by Microsoft

Microsoft has updated its taxonomy of failure modes in agentic AI systems after a year of red teaming against real-world deployments. The v2.0 framework adds seven new risk categories and expanded mitigations, giving security teams a more practical model for assessing agentic AI threats such as MCP/plugin abuse, goal hijacking, and session context contamination.

Security

Red Hat npm Miasma Attack Hits CI/CD Supply Chains

Microsoft Threat Intelligence uncovered a large-scale npm supply chain attack involving trojanized packages under the @redhat-cloud-services scope. The campaign abused a compromised CI/CD publishing workflow to deliver credential-stealing malware targeting GitHub, npm, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and developer systems, making it especially relevant for security teams and DevOps administrators.

Security

Microsoft Build 2026 Security: Code, Agents, Models

At Microsoft Build 2026, Microsoft announced new security capabilities to protect code, AI agents, and models across the development lifecycle. Highlights include the expanded preview of MDASH for exploitability-focused vulnerability discovery and general availability of Microsoft Defender integration with GitHub Code Security to help teams prioritize and remediate real risks faster.

Security

npm Dependency Confusion Attack Targets Developer Environments

Microsoft Threat Intelligence uncovered 33 malicious npm packages that abused dependency confusion to impersonate internal corporate packages and silently profile developer systems during installation. The campaign matters because it targets developer workstations and CI/CD environments, creating a foothold for potential follow-on supply chain attacks.